|
AXIOMS OF
Advanced BioStructural Correction
or
AXIOMS OF BODIES AND HOW THEY CAN BE
CORRECTED
Like you, I started out wondering how I could do better for
my patients. I had/have a practical engineering background,
even before being a doctor, so I'm a bit unreasonable about
accepting explanations for things that do not make sense
physically -- meaning I cannot use the information to create
the result someone claims can be made. (I didn't study
engineering afterward to prove some theory I made up or
liked.)
Anything taught in
Advanced BioStructural Correction
is easily demonstrated and testable BY YOU with simple
experiments right in your office or practice or even on your
spouse and kids. I started by observing that I could get
miracle results on one person with back pain, neck pain,
headaches, and even organic problems of some sorts, BUT I
could not consistently get those results on everyone walking
in the door and I could not predict which cases would get
better in which not. Very annoying -- especially to an
engineer.
I went to all the structural correction and other types of
techniques seminars and even acupuncture ( I was the first
in chiro CT doing needle acupuncture). When I could not
consistently and predictably get the results in my office
that the teaching doctors advertised, I flew out to theirs.
It turns out they either could not get them consistently or
worse, they were not doing what they taught adding a
little this here or a little that there. Dr. Gonstead was
famous for telling those who asked why he did something not
taught in his method seminars that you have to treat the
person in front of you, not the x-rays. Dr. Pettibon has
told me on the phone that everyone steals from everyone else
in the technique game and there is no one that will ever
find the answer.
If you look at
the problem as an engineer who has to work in the physical
world with objectively observable materials, you can come up
with the fact that the results are possible.
This is an objective observation because you sometimes get
those fantastic results now, but not always with conditions
that seem to be the same -- i.e., they have the same
symptoms or outward signs.
Why do "the same" conditions not respond to the same
treatments? The only valid statement you can make with the
objective observations available is that there are factors
creating the condition that are different from the ones
being addressed. They have been unknown and only addressed
by accident until now.
The basic
point is that there were other factors unknown to anyone,
until now.
In
Advanced BioStructural Correction
those factors have been found. As a result, you will
consistently and predictably correct bodies and have body
conditions not related to cancer, infections, fractures,
diabetes and the like vanish.
How were they found and how does it work? Read on:
Knowing there were unknown factors, I set out to find them.
You find factors by more observations, not fewer. I say this
because when chiropractic, osteopathic and other researchers
of the 1960s and 70s tried to prove chiropractic,
osteopathic and the whole basis of structural health care,
they could not come up with the answers.
They were dedicated and worked hard but because they
misunderstood basic engineering concepts, and vastly
underestimated the mechanical complexity of the body, their
attempts to find answers only led them to the conclusion
that what they observed happening on x-ray was as
unpredictable. A silly conclusion compared to the one that
there were other factors not understood, but they did not
seem to understand basis engineering so that is the one they
came up with.
At that point, political chiropractors decided to outlaw
full spine x-ray because it seemed to indicate they were
wrong about the fact that structural health care working, in
their case chiropractic. That was supremely Dumb.
What they were wrong about is HOW structural correction
worked to get the fantastic results it did. For some reason,
these doctors decided that hiding the whole issue would be
better than just saying, we haven't figured out how it works
at but all the clients know it works, because we get the
results many times. Seems silly, but it is what they did --
and these are still the leaders and their views today.
I searched for other factors using standing and sitting
full spine AP and lateral films and measuring just about
everything. (One case illustrating how revealing that is, is
on this web site under case studies.) After trying and
discarding over 80 theories -- because if they were true,
most of the patients could not exist. (These
theories include current chiropractic, osteopathic, and
other manipulative techniques taught in various disciplines
of structural health care. The failings are apparent in the
inconsistency and unpredictability of result and quantified
easily when measured against full spine standing and sitting
films.)
I stopped making theories and started to just observe.
Several things became evident immediately
(unfortunately, immediately took quite some time to get to
while I checked the things that everyone including me
thought were "obvious" and even now currently taught but
that did not and do not work to correct body structures
consistently).
These things are so readily observable, they are axioms.
Remember that an
axiom is an
established rule or principle or a self-evident truth.
These are self-evident because anyone can observe them
occurring in the physical universe, not because I say so.
The first AXIOM is:
AXIOM 1.
the body is not a
TOTALLY
self-correcting thing or machine but can
self-correct many of its mechanical and other pathologies.
(Self-evident by observation things go
wrong with bodies that they do self-correct and that they do
not self-correct. Therefore, bodies are partially
self-correcting but not totally self-correcting.)
It astonished me that the first of these axioms met with
opposition from doctors and even theologians.
The objections were things like, God made the body; the body
is the most perfect construct in the universe and therefore
works perfectly (obviously not since people get sick); and
the like. I did not know who or what designed and made
human bodies, but the following is obvious: Who or whatever
made human bodies did a good job but either on purpose or
accidentally -- which is not topic for this time and place
-- human bodies were made cannot be totally self-correcting
(otherwise we would not need doctors).
Obvious as this seems, many it is a new thought. Human
bodies are designed to be self-correcting in many facets and
ways -- just like a car is partially self-correcting; it can
correct for temperature and other changes in the environment
like smoothing out the ride on a bumpy road, but not for a
hole in a tire. Human bodies are also not totally
self-correcting. Certain things happen that lead to bodies
breaking down. This is not to say that we are bodies. I do
not think WE are bodies but they are physical objects we use
in this world. That is another discussion for some other
time. However, we do use bodies and they do have mechanical
breakdowns that can be corrected consistently and
predictably just like with cars.
Advanced BioStructural Correction
will teach you how to do it.
Given past failures to help bodies, this may be the first
time you are hearing that bodies can consistently be
corrected with any hope that it is true. Follow along, and
you will see not only that it is true but that you can
understand it.
This leads to axiom 2:
AXIOM
2. Health of a body is
defined as a body working optimally on a mechanical basis --
even the chemistry comes down to mechanics if you look at it
from a small enough viewpoint shapes of molecules and
atoms fitting together.
(Self-evident by observation.)
Another thing that seems obvious, but some have difficulty
with it. As stated above, we are not bodies, but we do use
bodies. In
Advanced BioStructural Correction
we are only concerned with correcting the mechanics of
bodies so they work well and are thus physically healthy.
Spiritual health, etc. is another discussion for some time
and place. Given that bodies are a chemical and mechanical
machine, the above axiom is readily observable. That is why
that is why there are records of people recovering from just
about everything when a bodys mechanics are corrected. And,
this is not just in massage chiropractic or osteopathy.
These records go back to ancient times and structural
treatments.
That axiom leads to the next:
AXIOM
3. To keep bodies healthy or
get bodies healthy one must make sure that the things the
body cannot self-correct are corrected by some outside
agency. (By
definition -- if bodies cannot self-correct something else
must correct them.)
Forget trying to have the body correct itself. The thing
that is wrong with the body is that there are things it
cannot self-correct.
Immediately evident from AXIOM 3
is that any method of structurally correcting the human body
that tries to get the body to self-correct by strengthening
muscles, reshaping ligaments or the like, can immediately be
dismissed. Strengthening muscles will help human
bodies COMPENSATE more and better, but muscles will not
CORRECT the body or what is wrong with it because bones
can go out of place in directions the body does not have
muscles oriented to pull them back into alignment. That
muscles compensate for bones that out of place in directions
the body has no muscles oriented to pull those bones back
into alignment is why some people need to work out to be
healthy and some hurt themselves working out and others
manage find just the normal activities enough to keep them
well. Those who NEED to workout to maintain health are
working to compensate for bones out of place that the body
cannot pull back into position because it has no muscles
oriented to pull in the directions needed.
This is the next axiom:
AXIOM
4. Regarding what the
body cannot self-correct: On the grossest scale, what the
body cannot self-correct are bones out of optimal mechanical
position in a direction the body has no muscle or
combination of muscles that can pull in the direction needed
to retrieve and replace the bone into its position of
optimal mechanical advantage for the body.
(This is not a theory. This is an objective observation of
anatomy/physiology and is thus self-evident.)
There is really nothing else to say about that. Regarding
the spine: If a vertebra (for those who are
not docs, ver ta bra is latin for a spinal bone)
moves out of place left, there are muscles there that can
pull the bone back into its correct position
(many times they dont but that is covered below under
compensations). Likewise, if a vertebra goes out of
place to the right there are muscles physically present that
can pull the bone left to its proper position. If a vertebra
goes out of place posterior, there are muscles -- psoas down
low, diaphragm mid and others above - that can pull the
vertebrae anterior.
(click here for experiments
you can do right now to demonstrate or prove that to
yourself.) YOU CAN TEST THIS FOR YOURSELF RIGHT
NOW. If someone tells you something is so, and you cannot
test it for yourself on your body or another's body, dont
believe it. If it is physically true, you can test it on the
next patient in the door or yourself or it is false.
An example: If a vertebra moves out of place anterior and
you can forget those who think it cannot by doing the test
of having someone breathe in and out a few times and then do
a hard P-to-A adjustment in the thoracics. Very few will
breathe better afterward. Most will breathe less deeply
because of the anterior just created. Anyway, if a vertebra
moves anterior, there are no muscles that attach from the
vertebra to something behind it. Therefore, nothing can pull
it posterior. Your body can rotate it in the saggital plane
and extend the vertebra leaning it into extension and
compensating for the anterior but the body cannot
self-correct it. (For complete data on this continue reading
the article on
Mechanisms.)
That brings us to the last axiom:
AXIOM
5. Regarding treatment of a body: Doctors should only
correct things that the body cannot self-correct.
By definition, the body will
self-correct the rest -- which are either bones out of place
as compensations, shifting the body's weight off what it
cannot correct or bones constantly pushed out of place by
the forces created by the bones out of place in a direction
the body cannot self-correct.
You might want to read that last paragraph under AXIOM 5
again because IT CONTAINS THE TWO REASONS THE BODY LEAVES
BONES OUT OF PLACE THAT IT DOES HAVE MUSCLES ORIENTED TO
PULL IN THE DIRECTIONS NEEDED TO CORRECT THOSE BONES.
EITHER THEY ARE COMPENSATIONS OR THEY JUST PLAIN KEEP
GETTING PUSHED OUT OF PLACE BY THE FORCES CREATED WHEN OTHER
BONES GO OUT OF PLACE IN DIRECTIONS THE BODY CANNOT
SELF-CORRECT.
As for which bones go out of place in directions the body
does not have muscles pulling in the direction needed, and
how to correct them: That is what makes
Advanced BioStructural Correction
so valuable.
Using
Advanced BioStructural Correction
you will find the bones out of place that the body cannot
self-correct or self-realign and consistently correct
everybody that walks in the door with a mechanical problem
not connected to cancer, infections, fractures and the like.
Doctors can test these axioms by calling 203 366-2746 to
learn the First Rib Maneuver
and can test other techniques of correcting body structure
against these axioms and find where those techniques fall
down. I say this not to make them wrong or promote
ABCC,
but to give an objective basis to evaluate the various
methodologies.
Our goal in
ABC
is to have doctors be able to correct every body that walks
in the door with the structural problem not connected to
cancer, infections, fractures, and like. You can do with
ABC,
but it probably is not real to you so call, learn
the first rib maneuver and get some reality on it. And,
call some of the doctors below and ask them.
Sincerely,
Dr.
Jesse Jutkowitz
CLICK HERE
TO GET YOUR
FREE GIFT!
|
