See below regarding the hard kyphosis this doc had before this ONE
Advanced Biostructural Correction™ treatment. Also, see below
regarding his cervical curve and effects of traction and Posterior-to-Anterior
spinal treatment and why it half the time or more it creates mechanical problems
even when it seems to change the cervical curve into more of a lordosis.

            
 Pretreatment       Post meningeal         Post tx #2           Post tx #3      Post entire protocol

These pictures are thumbnails. That means you can double click on them and have a high
resolution image that you can put in a word document or otherwise print for your own
comparison viewing only. You do not have permission to show these pictures to
anyone else. Refer them to this page if you want them to have this data.

   When he laid supine pretreatment, his head just barely hit the table in maximum extension.
There was almost no extension in the thoracic spine.

   Post meningeal and before he got up, his head laid on the table with just a bit of extension.

   You can see in the post meningeal picture how much that kyphosis changed above his sleeve level
and even below it, but you cannot see how much more flexible he is above the level of that sleeve.
Notice he now has some sort of lordosis that would have not shown on an x-ray pretreatment.

   It is extremely important to note that lack of lordosis in the initial picture (take a look at pic 1 and 2)
because it is NOT a lack of lordosis. THE LORDOSIS IS THERE but the body is stuck so far in flexion because
of what is occurring in the mid and upper thoracic spine it is just plain forced forward.

   This is a good one to remember when someone tells you to treat a cervical curve or scoliosis or some such thing.
Also remember it when you get the Advanced Biostructural Correction™ X-ray Seminar CDs and films. You
will learn that you cannot trust what you see on the films as being the configuration that is actually there. This
doc has a fairly normal lordosis, even in that first picture from a mechanical point of view.

   If you treated the flexed pelvis or reversal of the lumbars you wasted your time and probably made him worse.
What you are seeing on the x-rays is NOT the configuration of the spine as CBP™/Harrison, Pettibon, Woggin
and his Clear Institute, various Upper Cervical methods, Network and others would have you believe. It is the
configuration of the spine AS MODIFIED by any fixed curves and the weight bearing changes they make.  AND,
how they are changed by the weight bearing changes associated with changing position as from sitting to standing.

  Therefore, the things other teachers tell you to fix are most often, YES, MOST OFTEN, not even there. It is just
like taking a picture of a part of a tree that has a thousand pound weight hanging from some other part that is
not in the picture. You might think the tree is bent or that there was some developmental problem. Not looking
at the whole thing is silly at first. Stupid after you have been told, as all of them have been by me.
 

Rant over after this next paragraph. You might think it impertinent, but it is not when you consider that
NO ONE ELSE EVEN COMES CLOSE TO DELIVERING OR EVEN CLAIMING these changes on a consistent basis even
after months or years of treatment. Advanced Biostructural Correction™ promises this type of change or better
ON THE FIRST VISIT. Remember, this guy is a chiropractor and has been pushed the wrong way for years and was more
difficult to change than most of you.

(Other methods claiming structural change or practitioners or teachers with supposedly good answers, even those
silly guys who tell you to listen to them because they have TONS OF PUBLISHED RESEARCH are not or have not
until recently, taken or been telling you to take full spines so they have, and you have been missing most of what
is happening).  I have been taking full spine standing and sitting films AP and Lateral views and
measuring all the angles on all the views to create three dimensional models since 1981. I gave
all the data needed to Harrison in 1995. Still have his response letter telling me it was wrong to use calculus that
way to make determinations of spinal mechanics. Take a look at his latest research, full spine and measuring
moments of inertia of the vertebrae like I told him he would have to do way back in 1995. On the other hand,
he IS doing it, think about Pettibon, Woggin and all the others in Osteopathy, Chiropractic, Medicine and other
supposed methods of structural correction who are not even that close.

Cervical curve comment on this client and others below.
 

Again, this is something you can see in a couple of the sets of films included with the
Advanced Biostructural Correction™ X-ray Analysis Seminar available on CD and including
40 full spine films: AP and Lateral Full Spine and sequential treatments over months time and AP and Laterals
standing flat, one inch heel lift right, one inch heel lift left and why heels are always good for people, contrary to
most doctor's recommendations and why heel lifts in the "wrong side" often help symptomatically while slowly
breaking down the person's mechanics to hidden catastrophic body events years later.

Now, looking at the cervical curve in this client (take a look at pictures one and two). Most of his Forward Head Posture
comes from the curve at the T11 - T12 level. His lumbar spine is so bent under that strain that he has to flex his
pelvis and lean backward at that level. Does it matter what his cervical curve is doing? Yes, but not much.

Want the KEYS to this situation and how to correct it? Get the Advanced BioStructural Correction™ Seminar
NOW. Chiropractors and Osteopaths can usually learn it with an At-Home Seminar. Click here.